GDP by American states and their country equivalent

Homepage Forums Current Events Board GDP by American states and their country equivalent

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #10140
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      Gavin Newsom is bragging that “If California were a separate country, it would be the fourth largest economy in the world.” That’s true, right behind Germany.  SO I thought, “How would the rest of the American states fare? How large is their economy compared to the nearest country?”

      In the list below, I compared the 2024 state GDP with the closest country 2024 GDPs. Here are the closest matches:

      1. California / Japan, $4.1 trillion
      2. Texas / between France and Italy, $2.7T
      3. New York / between Canada and Italy, $2.3T
      4. Florida / Spain, $1.7T
      5. Illinois / Saudi Arabia, $1.1T
      6. Pennsylvania and Ohio/ Switzerland, $1T
      7. Georgia, Washington and New Jersey/ Poland, $882B
      8. North Carolina, Massachusetts, Virginia / Taiwan, $775B
      9. Michigan / Belgium, $706B
      10. Colorado / Ireland, $553
      11. Arizona and Tennessee/ UAE, $552B
      12. Maryland / Austria, $542B
      13. Indiana and Minnesota / Norway, $504B
      14. Wisconsin and Missouri/ Bangladesh, $551B
      15. Connecticut / Pakistan, $365B
      16. South Carolina / Czech Republic, $349B
      17. Oregon, Alabama & Louisiana / Chile, $331B
      18. Utah / Portugal, $301B
      19. Kentucky / Kazakhstan, $293B
      20. Oklahoma / Greece, $266B
      21. Nevada and Iowa / Iraq, $260B
      22. Kansas / Hungary, $235B
      23. Arkansas, District of Columbia & Nebraska/ Nigeria, $188B
      24. Mississippi / Kuwait, $157B
      25. New Mexico / Slovakia, $141B
      26. Idaho / Dominican Republic, $128B
      27. New Hampshire / Guatemala, $121B
      28. Hawaii / Angola, $115B
      29. West Virginia / Venezuela, $108B
      30. Delaware / Costa Rica, $103B
      31. Maine /Croatia, $99B
      32. Rhode Island / Sri Lanka, $82B
      33. Montana / Azerbaijan, $76B
      34. North and South Dakota / Slovenia, $75B
      35. Alaska / Belarus, $70B
      36. Wyoming / Macau, $53B
      37. Vermont / Latvia, $45B

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

    • #10141
      johnnyo53johnnyo53
      Participant

      BUT THE SLIMY PR*CK NEVER TALKS ABOUT HOW DEEP IN DEBT WE ARE…

      “I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?" "Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet. You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times." It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I

    • #10144
      AvatarBeeg_Dawg
      Participant

      California does not look quite as impressive when you take Chevron, Meta, Tesla and Google out of the picture.  Chevron is already out the door, the left is hell bent on destroying Tesla, Meta and Google could leave tomorrow if they choose to do so.

      Since 2019: Over 200 companies have relocated their headquarters out of California, including major firms like Chevron and Hewlett-Packard.

      In 2023, corporate tax revenue was approximately 50% below forecast, partly due to businesses reducing their presence in the state

      Movie production is abandoning LA, finding states other than California much less expensive. Ben Affleck recently blasted Newsome about his lack of support for the movie industry.  Rob Lowe noted it was cheaper to fly a hundred people to Ireland than walk across the parking lot to film at Fox.

      Ranked per capita, Cali comes in fourth, well behind New York, Massachusetts and Washington, but just ahead of Connecticut, North Dakota and Alaska.  California’s GDP as a percentage of US GP suddenly does not look as impressive when figuring in it’s percentage of the population.

       

      • This reply was modified 1 week, 6 days ago by AvatarBeeg_Dawg.
    • #10148
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      Here’s another fun fact. In March, economists expected the United States to gain 140,000 net new jobs. Instead, the USA gained 228,000 jobs.

      Also note that unemployment inched up from 4.1% to 4.2%, largely due to people returning to looking for work. The labor workforce participation rate increased to 62.5%. (from 62.4%). By way of comparison, the labor force participation rate averaged 62.84 percent from 1948 until 2025, reaching an all-time high of 67.30 percent in January 2000 and a record low of 58.10 percent in December 1954.

      U.S. added 228,000 jobs in March, beating forecasts, as economists warn of turbulence

      Not so for California. California lost 11,600 jobs. But here’s the tragic part: California gained 15,200 government and taxpayer-funded jobs, while losing 26,800 private-sector jobs. Can’t wait to hear Gov. Newsom take credit for that.

      California lost 11,600 net jobs in March, nearly half of new jobs from welfare

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.