Homepage › Forums › Current Events Board › Times Publishes Condemnation Piece on WHO and China
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 5 months ago by
Genuine Realist.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 4, 2020 at 2:48 pm #3437
cardcrimsonParticipant“As it praised Beijing, the World Health Organization concealed concessions to China and may have sacrificed the best chance to unravel the virus’s origins. Now it’s a favorite Trump attack line.”
“Nine months and more than 1.1 million deaths later, there is still no transparent, independent investigation into the source of the virus. Notoriously allergic to outside scrutiny, China has impeded the effort, while leaders of the World Health Organization, if privately frustrated, have largely ceded control, even as the Trump administration has fumed. . . .
At the same time, the health organization pushed misleading and contradictory information about the risk of spread from symptomless carriers. Its experts were slow to accept that the virus could be airborne. Top health officials encouraged travel as usual, advice that was based on politics and economics, not science.”
Of course, they publish it the day AFTER the election. . . .
Even GR noted the ironic timing on TOS.
How long until they release their stories on Hunter and Jim?
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 5 months ago by
cardcrimson.
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 5 months ago by
-
November 4, 2020 at 3:21 pm #3440
Genuine RealistParticipantI’ve had no problem with a-pox-on-both-your-houses attitude sine day one.
The MSM, and particularly the Times, Post, and CNN, have been rabid since day one. Inexcusable.
On the other hand, Trump could have defused this easily. He controls the dialog with tweets. He chooses not to – either he’s too narcissistic to control himself, or (more likely) he feels the contentiousness is helpful to him.
He’s wrong. He doesn’t have a bad record, and he could have run on it (always assuming a common sense about covid that he did not display). But Trump likes driving the opposition into a fury. That’s almost the worst quality a President could have.
The hell with both sides.
I wouldn't give you two cents for all your fancy rules if, behind them, they didn't have a little bit of plain, ordinary, everyday kindness - yeah, and a little looking out for the other fella, too.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.