Homepage › Forums › Current Events Board › The Texas Lawsuit Will Determine Our Next President
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 10 months ago by
Rocky17.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 8, 2020 at 9:50 pm #3928
Rocky17
ParticipantThis is it. SCOTUS has received it. SCOTUS is requiring a response from four battleground states referenced. The suit is comprehensive, complete, includes factual and anecdotal information, has mathematical and computer modeling and had to be filed with the SCOTUS by Constitutional law. Basically, it reflects what I and others have spoken of since the day after the election. The questions that will be answered will be these: Will the rights of Texas and all other states supersede the Constitutional violations the referenced states incurred in allowing illegal votes via mail and in person by circumventing the respective state legislatures. The laws are clear. Will SCOTUS allow these violations which led to unknown results as to accuracy or will they agree these questionable results need be thrown out and the electoral votes for those states involved be determined by the respective state legislatures.
Despite possibly being the only person left on this board who is a believer, I think SCOTUS will do what I expect them to do and Trump will be elected. I do not think they have a choice or illegality will be a part of every future federal election from this day forward. The complete suit is as follows. Note that the odds of Biden overcoming Trumps lead at 3 AM on November 4, 2020 has been calculated at 1 in a quadrillion to the power of 4. Think about that.
-
December 8, 2020 at 10:27 pm #3929
Genuine Realist
ParticipantThat litigation is a joke.
As even you should be able to see.
(Hint: there is a reason why this was filed five weeks after the election, rather than the next day.)
You are embarrassing yourself. If b that’s possible.
I wouldn't give you two cents for all your fancy rules if, behind them, they didn't have a little bit of plain, ordinary, everyday kindness - yeah, and a little looking out for the other fella, too.
-
December 9, 2020 at 6:45 am #3930
Rocky17
ParticipantRegardless of the opinion of our resident legal lilliputian, the President’s attorney’s brother shares my opinion that this is the ballgame, win or lose. I may be wrong, but I think I am entitled to the opinion in spite of the scorn from an ex government employee from the socialist state of California. In a year or two, I could possibly be incarcerated for disagreeing with the new regime, should our dementia ridden President elect or his Marxist VP elect be inducted into office. I would love to hear his opinion of the actions yesterday of LA`s new Soros/ Zuckerberg installed DA. Well, probably not. Maybe the next AG of this ilk will be installed in his county of residence, with any luck.
Defendants apparently will be given priority over victims. Resisting arrest is now just fine and not a chargeable offense according to a newly retired LA county DA who was on Tucker Carlson last evening.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/la-district-attorney-death-penalty-cash-bail-police-union
-
December 9, 2020 at 8:57 am #3931
Legend
KeymasterMy take: I have no problem with the challenges in the courts, that’s what counts are for.
I do believe that it’s better for challenges to be heard over all than for them to be dismissed out of hand. If fraud was egregious enough for a court to hear it, then perhaps it needs to be addressed.
the biggest issue to me is that if one party improves its position by cheating, whether that be through big city voting machines or Russian influence, then the legislature ought to prevent that kind of cheating in the next election. Otherwise there’s a huge incentive for cheating. Only way to get it out there legitimately is in the courts.
____________________________________________________________
Sic transit gloria mundi (so shut up and get back to work) -
December 9, 2020 at 8:57 am #3932
Legend
KeymasterMy take: I have no problem with the challenges in the courts, that’s what courts are for.
I do believe that it’s better for challenges to be heard over all than for them to be dismissed out of hand. If fraud was egregious enough for a court to hear it, then perhaps it needs to be addressed.
the biggest issue to me is that if one party improves its position by cheating, whether that be through big city voting machines or Russian influence, then the legislature ought to prevent that kind of cheating in the next election. Otherwise there’s a huge incentive for cheating. Only way to get it out there legitimately is in the courts.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by
Legend.
____________________________________________________________
Sic transit gloria mundi (so shut up and get back to work) -
This reply was modified 4 years, 10 months ago by
-
December 9, 2020 at 9:33 am #3934
rjnwmill
ParticipantRocky, no surprise here, this action is our politics in microcosm. It is playing out as things tend to do now; weak political leadership hides personal inaction and the avoidance of responsibility in court actions. Why step forward and do your job when you can sit on the sidelines and hide behind the robes.
Each of the four state legislatures could take a vote on the Trump/Republican initiative to override the reported vote totals and appoint electors independently. Not a one has voted. Further, the Republican GA legislature could address security issues associated with absentee ballots in advance of the runoffs scheduled in January. They’ve done nothing. It’s “safe” to stay happily on the bench without having to take a stand on issues at the core of our systems of self rule. Honestly, does anyone believe there are no opportunities to upgrade election procedures & infrastructure in GA?
Our “leadership” has learned and diligently practices the lessons of “lead from behind” all too well. Fortunately, Adams, Jefferson & 54 other brave souls signed the Declaration of Independence. I agree with Legend, the court should hear the arguments and offer an opinion on the Texas litigation.
Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long -
December 9, 2020 at 9:28 pm #3947
Rocky17
ParticipantThis so called “frivolous” Texas civil action has now morphed into a 18+ state lawsuit and has also been enjoined by the President. While retired government employees in a socialist haven have deemed its value as embarrassing and worthless, some very serious AGs in at least 18 states have staked their personal reputation and integrity on the verity, accuracy and worth of this legal action. Just another bunch of unimportant, sadly mistaken flyover human trash, no doubt.
Oh, to be self serving, self righteous and arrogant.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.