Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Must be the Wakanda National Anthem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2jqJ5CECWE
[quote quote=952]you had trump’s podiatrist eh?[/quote]
Roscoe, you are one savage mfer. Well played.
“This guy makes Harding and Pierce look like Marcus Aurelius.”
Could be a Hall of Fame sentence right there!
TC, check your browser settings. I know when I close my browser, all settings and history gets erased.
Missed part of the link.
Fraud can’t happen? 1.2 million stimulus checks went to dead people. If dead people can file taxes and qualify for a stimulus check, I’m pretty sure they can vote as well.
And it will continue until common sense prevails. I sense pushback is starting to form, but the children have discovered how far they can push. New boundaries are being established. Protests will fade until the next incident and subsequent outrage. More looting, vandalism and physical harm to law abiding citizens because elected officials are more concerned with appeasing law breakers than maintaining social order.
He fell from a high rise? Can’t blame Clinton for this one. It is most definitely a C-19 related death.
Add rape to list of violence.
“On Monday, some CHOP members called for changes to the zone over the violence. In an open letter addressed to organizers, a group of 25 activists and volunteers asked leaders to set up a safe use area on the outskirts of the zone, create different signage encouraging intoxicated persons to stay away and implement a curfew to prevent destructive behavior at night.”
A safe area? I thought CHAZ is a SAFE area. Encourage intoxicated people to stay away? With signs? OMG, who are these people?
So here we have a another lib hoping that not taking action would produce a desired outcome. Yeah, like that plan works all the time.
Roscoe, he didn’t forget anything. Thomas addressed APA head on, stating it couldn’t apply to Obama’s XO because it was not legally executed.
What process do you follow to eliminate a rule that technically can’t exist?
Roscoe, a couple of things.
In my limited understanding, USSC ruled on the procedure rather than the legality of the action. Justice Thomas hit the nail on the head.“Thomas’ main objection to the majority of the court, which voted to uphold the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program, also called DACA, in the face of Trump efforts to roll it back, was that the Obama administration did not go through the proper channels in the first place. Thomas said because of that, Trump should have been able to dismantle the program without justification.”
Obama questioned if had authority to legally implement DACA. When Congress wouldn’t act, he did. Trump gave Congress a chance to implement a LEGAL version of DACA, giving it 6 months. Granted, he wanted his wall, end of chain migration and the lottery. Dems could have gotten DACA and more, but they refused to budge and give Trump a win. How is Trump’s action remarkably different from Obama’s?
“The dispute before the Court is not whether DHS may rescind DACA. All parties agree that it may,” the Chief Justice wrote. “The dispute is instead primarily about the procedure the agency followed in doing so.”
Thomas countered with:”Then-Attorney General Sessions correctly concluded that this ultra vires program should be rescinded. These cases could—and should—have ended with a determination that his legal conclusion was correct,” Thomas said. “Without grounding its position in either the APA or precedent, the majority declares that DHS was required to overlook DACA’s obvious legal deficiencies and provide additional policy reasons and justifications before restoring the rule of law.”
Thomas also said that even though the reason DHS gave for the rescinding the policy — that DACA was not done under the proper legal authority — was more than enough, it wasn’t even required to do that.
“Nothing in the APA suggests that DHS was required to spill any ink justifying the rescission of an invalid legislative rule, let alone that it was required to provide policy justifications beyond acknowledging that the program was simply unlawful from the beginning,” he said.
Sotomayor railed that Roberts should have considered Trumps comments about Hipanics as racist, and racism was his motivation for rescinding DACA. So now we have a ruling about process and intent. No examination of Trump rolling back an illegal XO, but did he follow correct procedure and was it racially motivated.
For those celebrating the decision, claiming DACA is saved, just ain’t so. Dreamers are still in jeopardy until Congress passes a law that gives legal status. All that happened is more uncertainty for Dreamers.
“Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision,” Thomas wrote. “The Court could have made clear that the solution respondents seek must come from the Legislative Branch. Instead, the majority has decided to prolong [the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS)] initial overreach by providing a stopgap measure of its own.”
The majority opened the door for more executive order fookery. What stops Trump- or a future president – from writing executive orders that will stand for years waiting for courts?
Not like Bolton hasn’t carpet bombed everyone and everything in DC.
“George W. Bush later appeared to regret his choice of Bolton, reportedly saying he didn’t “consider Bolton credible.” Those remarks, made in the final days of his administration, came after Bolton wrote a column in the Journal, criticizing the Bush administration: “Nothing can erase the ineffable sadness of an American presidency, like this one, in total intellectual collapse.””
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/03/john-bolton/556346/
He is going to sell a shit load of books, regardless of what he says about Trump.
