- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 5 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
🚨 NEW Flynn docs
11/8/16: "So glad they're closing Razor"
12/5/16: Disagreement with getting Flynn financials. "We didn't find anything…"
12/5/16: "This [investigation] is a nightmare"
1/5/17: After Obama WH meeting – Razor is going to stay open.
Thread. pic.twitter.com/0s2FrR6w7M
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) September 24, 2020
#Durham Full Story: Primary sub-source for Steele dossier was subject of 2009 FBI counterintelligence case + those facts known to Crossfire Hurricane team Dec 2016 + more warnings dossier credibility Jan 2017 + dossier still used for 3 renewals. @CBSNews https://t.co/DPl9v6uwxl
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) September 25, 2020
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1309230041209999361
For the poster questioning how people should view citation to left-wing sources exclusively, I’ll leave this here.
Here’s the first (and so far only) DNC controlled mainstream media journalist to tweet about the bombshell Russia hoax developments. And it’s a Justin Bieber joke. What a disgrace. https://t.co/x2chJyDjI1
— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) September 24, 2020
The media is involved in information, or should I say disinformation laundering. In order to gin up a case, a bad law enforcement or intelligence agent “leaks” a story to a main stream media “journalist,” the “journalist” publishes a story, and the story becomes the basis for opening a case or validating disinformation for a warrant.
So @BuzzFeed, CNN and others in the American media played a key role in 2017 in disseminating an explosive dossier whose primary sub-source "might actually be a Russian spy"? https://t.co/igUt8T7N0u
— Alberto Miguel Fernandez (@AlbertoMiguelF5) September 25, 2020
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.