Homepage › Forums › Current Events Board › Lindsey Graham
- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
rogpodge.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 4, 2022 at 1:54 am #5844
BeyondThunderdome
ParticipantIs there a way to kick someone out of the Senate? WTF is wrong with this asshole?
https://www.wrdw.com/2022/03/04/sen-lindsey-graham-calls-assassination-vladimir-putin/
Regardless of what you think of Putin, does anyone think this is something a senior Senator should saying publicly about a guy with nukes who is already paranoid and being backed into a corner?
NO MALARKEY
-
March 4, 2022 at 3:01 pm #5848
-
March 4, 2022 at 3:15 pm #5849
rjnwmillParticipantIf we have the ability to achieve that outcome, why advertise? If not, how do we benefit from additional threats of more “super secret crippling sanctions”?
I don’t see how Graham advances our interests.
Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long -
March 4, 2022 at 3:43 pm #5851
MickParticipantSounds just like Henry II…
-
March 5, 2022 at 10:06 am #5853
-
March 5, 2022 at 9:20 pm #5856
rjnwmillParticipantIn an interview Tim Kaene put a stake through the Whitehouse narrative that they are leading the coalition on Eukrain policy. When asked if the imposition of the current sanction regimen might have precluded the invasion if it had been imposed 90 days ago, the Senator stated it might have. However he notes 90 days ago our team couldn’t convince the Europeans to go along with the approach. The Europeans elected to do nothing until after the invasion commenced. He further states US sanctions alone would have been much less impactful. Who exactly have we been “leading”?
Now this:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senators-meet-zelenskyy-lethal-aid
We’re stopping the Poles from providing aircraft. Seems problematic that we have to wait for the president of Ukraine to release the details of our policy? A tough choice, but the White House should be more transparent?
Between this and the unwillingness to impose oil sanctions one has to ask who and how are we balancing the trade offs? Are we sold out for a Russian brokered Iran deal?
Time for policy disclosure and discussion?
Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long -
March 5, 2022 at 10:39 pm #5861
cardcrimsonParticipantAnd the White House, alone, is not stopping funding Putin’s war by continuing to buy Russian oil. Even Pelosi says ban it. Wonder what Putin has on Hunter. . . .
-
March 29, 2022 at 3:57 pm #5904
rogpodge
Participanthttps://mobile.twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1508525310295351298?cxt=HHwWhIC57d7xre8pAAAA
Well, the President decided to come in over the top.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.