How many people does it take to run a city?

Homepage Forums Current Events Board How many people does it take to run a city?

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #11158
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      Here are the current number of adults residing in American and Californian cities, along with the number who are members of the municipal workforce, thereby answering the question “How many people does it take to run a city?

      If you’d asked me how many municipal employees San Francisco had before I read this article, I would have said 10,000 to 14,000. Ah, no. The answer is 34,800, I kid you not.

      Daniel Lurie’s SF budget plan is already meeting resistance – and it’s not even out yet

      That is just an extraordinary number of municipal employees, nearly 5% of all adults in San Francisco work for the city of SF. That’s 3x to 5x (except for worker’s paradise NYC, and junior varsity worker’s paradise Seattle) more than any of these other cities, none of which are known for their restraint in hiring employees:

      San Francisco              715,000          34,800 4.87%
      New York          6,765,500       292,483 4.32%
      Seattle              673,200          13,700 2.04%
      Chicago          2,193,400          36,063 1.64%
      Los Angeles          3,134,000          50,000 1.60%
      Portland              532,100             7,284 1.37%
      Sacramento              420,600             5,000 1.19%
      San Diego          1,146,000          13,100 1.14%
      San Jose              792,900             7,000 0.88%

      I am absurdly proud of the fact that San Jose has the smallest percentage. We’re basically the same size as SF (about 12% larger) with 1/5th the municipal workers.

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

    • #11159
      AvatarBeeg_Dawg
      Participant

      Amazing how the beast grows.

      Washington is hiring 300 accountants to enforce it’s new millionaire tax, although its implementation is two years away.  I get the sense they will retain their jobs even if the tax is found to violate the  state constitution and is tossed.

    • #11161
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      I tried to do a comparison of IRS auditors hired (or let go) by each President. Party doesn’t seem to matter much. Here they are ranked by addition and subtraction over the course of each President’s term since WWII:

      President
      Net change in IRS revenue agents
      George W. Bush 123
      John F. Kennedy 1,859
      Joe Biden 2,502
      Dwight Eisenhower 2,966
      Ronald Reagan 3,742
      George H. W. Bush −1,429
      Donald Trump (1st term) −2,010
      Barack Obama −2,707
      Bill Clinton −3,066

       

      Interesting that the two largest auditor increases came under Republicans and the two largest net decreases in auditors came under Democrats. I knew that Clinton had a significant Federal employee reduction program.

      Couldn’t get reliable data on Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Ford or Carter.

      • This reply was modified 4 days, 15 hours ago by Mick1Mick1.
      • This reply was modified 4 days, 15 hours ago by Mick1Mick1.

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.