Homepage › Forums › Current Events Board › How many people does it take to run a city?
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 days, 15 hours ago by
Mick1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
April 15, 2026 at 11:58 am #11158
Mick1ParticipantHere are the current number of adults residing in American and Californian cities, along with the number who are members of the municipal workforce, thereby answering the question “How many people does it take to run a city?
If you’d asked me how many municipal employees San Francisco had before I read this article, I would have said 10,000 to 14,000. Ah, no. The answer is 34,800, I kid you not.
Daniel Lurie’s SF budget plan is already meeting resistance – and it’s not even out yet
That is just an extraordinary number of municipal employees, nearly 5% of all adults in San Francisco work for the city of SF. That’s 3x to 5x (except for worker’s paradise NYC, and junior varsity worker’s paradise Seattle) more than any of these other cities, none of which are known for their restraint in hiring employees:
San Francisco 715,000 34,800 4.87% New York 6,765,500 292,483 4.32% Seattle 673,200 13,700 2.04% Chicago 2,193,400 36,063 1.64% Los Angeles 3,134,000 50,000 1.60% Portland 532,100 7,284 1.37% Sacramento 420,600 5,000 1.19% San Diego 1,146,000 13,100 1.14% San Jose 792,900 7,000 0.88% I am absurdly proud of the fact that San Jose has the smallest percentage. We’re basically the same size as SF (about 12% larger) with 1/5th the municipal workers.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
-
April 15, 2026 at 1:36 pm #11159
Beeg_Dawg
ParticipantAmazing how the beast grows.
Washington is hiring 300 accountants to enforce it’s new millionaire tax, although its implementation is two years away. I get the sense they will retain their jobs even if the tax is found to violate the state constitution and is tossed.
-
April 16, 2026 at 12:31 pm #11161
Mick1ParticipantI tried to do a comparison of IRS auditors hired (or let go) by each President. Party doesn’t seem to matter much. Here they are ranked by addition and subtraction over the course of each President’s term since WWII:
PresidentNet change in IRS revenue agents George W. Bush 123 John F. Kennedy 1,859 Joe Biden 2,502 Dwight Eisenhower 2,966 Ronald Reagan 3,742 George H. W. Bush −1,429 Donald Trump (1st term) −2,010 Barack Obama −2,707 Bill Clinton −3,066 Interesting that the two largest auditor increases came under Republicans and the two largest net decreases in auditors came under Democrats. I knew that Clinton had a significant Federal employee reduction program.
Couldn’t get reliable data on Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Ford or Carter.
-
This reply was modified 4 days, 15 hours ago by
Mick1.
-
This reply was modified 4 days, 15 hours ago by
Mick1.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
-
This reply was modified 4 days, 15 hours ago by
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.