Musk v Media Matters

Homepage Forums Current Events Board Musk v Media Matters

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #7944
      rjnwmillrjnwmill
      Participant

      A fascinating story about our politics is unfolding in real time. Media Matters published a story on November 16th stating that the content offered by paying X advertisers was appearing adjacent to objectionable user content- racist or antisemitic. This article is the latest Media Matters effort to degrade the reputation of X.

      November 20th Musk files suit in the Federal Court, Northern District of Texas alleging purposeful misrepresentation and subsequent financial damages.

      Here is a Daily Caller article about the unfolding story. It includes a link to the Musk filing. It’s only 15 pages and is worth reading.

      https://dailycaller.com/2023/11/20/elon-musks-x-sues-media-matters/

      Fascinating here is that Media Matters generated the content they used in their article through a trial and error process conducted on the X platform. As a consequence, X/Musk knows precisely what was done by Media Matters to create “evidence” about how advertisers are damaged through their association with X.

      Mick, what do you know about the lawyers Musk is working with?

      Ps:  the State of Texas has joined the fray. And after his recent impeachment, I suspect AG Paxton may feel he has a dog in this fight?

      https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1726767436618191177?s=42

      • This topic was modified 9 months, 3 weeks ago by rjnwmillrjnwmill.

      Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
      Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long

    • #7946
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      Near as I can tell, they’re top flight. Judd Stone graduated first in his Northwestern Law School class and clerked for Justice Scalia. John Sullivan graduated summa cum laude from Notre Dame Law School, was Exec Editor of the ND Law Review, interned for the Chief Justice of the Dallas Court of Appeals and is the President Emeritus of the Dallas Chapter of the Federalist Society. Those are the two that you’d want in your corner.

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

    • #7949
      Avatarrogpodge
      Participant
    • #7952
      rjnwmillrjnwmill
      Participant

      A layman’s analysis of the issues/arguments to be advanced in court.

      https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/holdx-suit-against-media-matters-faces-likely-first-amendment-defense

      Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
      Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long

      • #7954
        LegendLegend
        Keymaster

        “You can tell a lie with technical truths and that’s what they’ve done here.”

        nothing characterizes 21st century politics more clearly than this statement.

        ____________________________________________________________
        Sic transit gloria mundi (so shut up and get back to work)

    • #7953
      Mick1Mick1
      Participant

      Interesting. Judge Pittman, like Musk’s counsel, is a member of the Federalist society. He is a Trump appointee (and had prior nominations from Rick Perry and Greg Abbott) and is what I would consider to be an activist judge. SOme people think he overreaches:

      A Constitutional Republic Demands a Constrained Judiciary: | Laurence H. Tribe | Verdict | Legal Analysis and Commentary from Justia

       

      Audaces fortuna iuvat

      • #7956
        rjnwmillrjnwmill
        Participant

        I believe he’s recused himself.

        Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
        Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.