Trump needs to permanently step aside

Homepage Forums Current Events Board Trump needs to permanently step aside

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #6616
      AvatarNeodymium60
      Participant

      He proved to be the Democrats biggest weapon.  Trump’s endorsement of candidates proved to be voter repellant.

      NH’s Maggie Hassan was an easy pick up for Republicans but Democrats saw an opening with Trump endorsed Don Bolduc.  Democrats supported his primary run and then threw a blizzard of advertising money at him in the last two weeks as Mitch McConnell dried up his financial support long before the election.  Bolduc was left high and dry and lost.

      Trump did some good things in office but he has to leave the stage forever.

    • #6617
      johnnyo53johnnyo53
      Participant

      Abortion was their biggest weapon. Republicans didn’t mobilize sufficiently, independents are still gamed, and liberal  women want the right to choose not to use 9 different types of contraception or common sense who/ how they bang. Republicans still don’t know how to fight dirty. Look at Maricopa County. Let Trump and DeSantis slug it out, may the best man win. The problem is we have no bench nationwide.

      • This reply was modified 2 months, 3 weeks ago by johnnyo53johnnyo53.

      “I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?" "Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet. You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times." It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I

    • #6619
      LegendLegend
      Keymaster

      If trump were a team player, here’s what he should do:

      1. announce a run for president. Not now but, say just before desantis

      2.  Act as the stalking horse for desantis… keep desantis in the news and to the left of “perceived trump” (I say perceived because trump was never a hard right pol).

      3.  Make it about exposure and favorable coverage for desantis, while doing his “trump” thing to rile the 15 % of the electorate that is “MAGA TRUMP”

       

      4.  Go through the primaries with a goal of winning a few but putting desantis on offense and keeping him in the news.  The Dems are sure to have a primary fight in 24 OR they will have Biden getting plenty of pub.

      5.  Drop out and endorse desantis. Leaving desantis as a sane, logical, centrist choice against Biden or whatever other lefty loon the Dems put in place.

      this will never happen because trump is about trump.

      and, I agree he needs to get off the stage.

      ____________________________________________________________
      Sic transit gloria mundi (so shut up and get back to work)

    • #6620
      AvatarBrix
      Participant

      I voted  for Trump in the past…but I will  never do it again.

      I like many of his policies, but he has too many negative character issues.

      Also, his recent comment about DeSantis just before the election was the final straw. I wish he would just fade away.

    • #6621
      AvatarBeeg_Dawg
      Participant

      [quote quote=6619]If trump were a team player, here’s what he should do: 1. announce a run for president. Not now but, say just before desantis 2. Act as the stalking horse for desantis… keep desantis in the news and to the left of “perceived trump” (I say perceived because trump was never a hard right pol). 3. Make it about exposure and favorable coverage for desantis, while doing his “trump” thing to rile the 15 % of the electorate that is “MAGA TRUMP” 4. Go through the primaries with a goal of winning a few but putting desantis on offense and keeping him in the news. The Dems are sure to have a primary fight in 24 OR they will have Biden getting plenty of pub. 5. Drop out and endorse desantis. Leaving desantis as a sane, logical, centrist choice against Biden or whatever other lefty loon the Dems put in place. this will never happen because trump is about trump. and, I agree he needs to get off the stage.[/quote]

      Trump is a team player on a one man team.

    • #6622
      AvatarBeeg_Dawg
      Participant

      [quote quote=6620]I voted for Trump in the past…but I will never do it again. I like many of his policies, but he has too many negative character issues. Also, his recent comment about DeSantis just before the election was the final straw. I wish he would just fade away.[/quote]

      Brix- in 4 sentences, you stated exactly how I feel about Trump.  Right now he is the glue that holds the democratic party together. Seems like every political ad from the left in the last 3 weeks mentioned MAGA, Trump supporter or election denier.

      Trump needs to step aside…..

    • #6626
      AvatarMick
      Participant

      I don’t think Trump has a chance to win the primary — unless many Republicans get in and split the primary vote. He has a lot of support, no question. But I have to think that cooler heads will prevail. In a very strange way, he’ll generate a huge turnout among the anti-Trump Republicans — for that reason, I actually support the idea of him running. Republicans will register to vote in record numbers. Based upon how Trump’s candidates got trounced last week, I have to think his support is receding. Not just that, it is likely that Biden and other progressive Democrats will continue to stink up the joint. Incidentally, I don’t dislike Democrats — I’m a registered Independent, and I prefer to think carefully and soberly about any politician for whom I vote.  I voted for Obama over McCain and for Romney over Obama.

      Once Trump loses the primary, he and the anti-democracy/vote conspiracy people will be finished. I do, however, hope that his common-sense policies remain. Every time I hear a politician support a common sense, middle-of-the-road policy, I want to weep, because it’s so rare. That’s what attracted people to Trump in the first place. And let’s not forget that if there wasn’t a COVID pandemic, Trump would have won the 2020 Presidential election. Or if it had been any other candidate instead of you-can-always-count-on-Joe-Biden-to-f-things-up (my favorite Obama quote), then Trump would have won, because the Dems were only running polemicists like Bernie or Pocahontas.

      • #6627
        rjnwmillrjnwmill
        Participant

        “I voted for Obama over McCain and for Romney over Obama.”

        I did too.

        And while I agree with your comfortable approach there is an element I find troubling. With Trump, you vote for a demonstrated record. His commitment to your “common sense policies” is unquestionable.

        Politicians however are committed to their perceived self interest alone. Look no further than Fetterman, Hassan and Ryan. They were Trump policy mavens the last four weeks of their campaigns. Did you believe them Mick?

        Tell me, who enters the Republican primary season that you trust?  They’ll all pledge fealty to Trump’s policies. Yet they’re all hoping to tap the same money and the money guys weren’t too wild about Trump.

        Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
        Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long

    • #6628
      AvatarNeodymium60
      Participant

      The Justice Dept and the NY AG want to arrest, convict and jail Trump.   They want to publicly destroy, bankrupt,  and humiliate him and everyone who supports him.   Now is the best time to do it because if it backfires there will be 2 years to recover.

      The tragedy of this election for the American people may end up being that we will never know in it’s entirely what happened on Jan 6 unless Republicans take the house and continue the Jan 6 hearings and bring forward defense witnesses to get to the bottom of all involved on both sides.  So far it has been a sham trial. If Democrats take the House they can run the hearing indefinitely to  divert attention from all of the ongoing problems they have created. They will have Trump and Republicans in a straight jacket.

       

      • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by AvatarNeodymium60.
      • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by AvatarNeodymium60.
      • #6631
        BeyondThunderdomeBeyondThunderdome
        Participant

        Both sides? JFC. I am going to regret engaging here, but I didn’t realize this delusion is still alive.

        NO MALARKEY

    • #6632
      BeyondThunderdomeBeyondThunderdome
      Participant

      Lots of Trump Derangement Syndrome among conservatives, lately, lol.

      NO MALARKEY

    • #6633
      AvatarNeodymium60
      Participant

      [quote quote=6631]Both sides? JFC. I am going to regret engaging here, but I didn’t realize this delusion is still alive.[/quote]

      The purpose of the Jan 6 Commission was to win an election.  Otherwise it would have been bipartisan.  I tend to believe Trump is indictable but not convictible in a fair trial because once you poison the well with censorship it can never be reversed.  That’s where we all lose.

      The only difference between you and me is that I believe in freedom.  You believe in freedom and want censorship.   BTW they are coming for Elon Musk for believing in free speech.

      • #6697
        BeyondThunderdomeBeyondThunderdome
        Participant

        Replying to Neodymium who wrote, “The purpose of the Jan 6 Commission was to win an election.  Otherwise it would have been bipartisan.”

        Well, it was McConnell (Republican leader) who decided against a bi-partisan Senate commission. And McCarthy pulled the plug on participating when Pelosi vetoed a couple of MAGA nutcases, but accepted three others nominated by him.

        I think just about every key witness in the investigation was Republican, so there were endless opportunities for them to testify and make their case. But many of them refused to cooperate. The ones who did cooperate, though, made it quite clear that Republicans were culpable.

        And to your point, Neodymium, that I want censorship:  no, I believe the government has no right to censor, but private companies do have the right to determine what is on their private platforms. Maybe it’s not always a good idea. There’s an argument to be made that exposing bad ideas to the daylight, instead of shunting them over to some dark-web, is the only way to allow people to change minds. But I nevertheless support the right of private companies to determine their own content policies.

        To your point about Elon Musk, I support his right to kick Kanye West off Twitter. I’m curious where you come down on that.

        NO MALARKEY

    • #6698
      AvatarNeodymium60
      Participant

      West is a trivial person to me.  What I categorize as mind clutter.   If someone wants to be offended by him they can go to Twitter, Tic Toe and Facebook and actively choose to be insulted.  I’m on no social media accounts.  That’s my choice.

      I know it’s splitting hairs but we make our choices.  I don’t care what Musk does with his Twitter toy.   You’d rather see West banned.  It makes you feel better. I don’t care.

      I can always come to CEB and read very good posts when I want from everyone including yourself.  And I’d love to see Mendi and Fog City here too.

       

    • #6699
      rjnwmillrjnwmill
      Participant

      BT, should there be disclosure requirements on private companies/social media platforms when they become aware of potentially illegal activities?

      If a government employee were self dealing on procurement transactions isn’t it a good thing when it sees the light of day?  Shouldn’t private actors be required to report those activities?

      Your straw man suggests that the media companies were censoring content independently. That’s clearly not the case here. There was active engagement by government employees to suppress speech. My understanding is that that’s a no no for the government and I think an ethical lapse by “independent” media.

      One step further, the Baker activities ant Twitter over the last week might be viewed as criminal, destruction of evidence that is potentially relevant to the review of what FBI staff has done. We’ll see when his censorship activities are clearly documented.

      I also note that private censorship may damage law enforcement. The San Bernardino attack on government offices was frustrated by Apple’s decision not to unlock the perps phones. Is their position appropriate when deaths occur?  And correct me if I’m wrong, doesn’t law enforcement as a matter of practice review the social media accounts of perps to better understand motives and independence of a criminal action?  Do I want private actors censoring such speech when as Neo points out, he’s perfectly able to apply his own personal screens?

      I’m not at all convinced that your reliance on personal actors to impose speech restrictions universally is appropriate generally and on political speech particularly.

      Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
      Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.