Homepage › Forums › Current Events Board › Court Rules PA Secretary of State Lacked Power to Change Election Date
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 6 months ago by
rjnwmill.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 12, 2020 at 2:11 pm #3594
-
November 12, 2020 at 4:13 pm #3599
Beeg_Dawg
ParticipantLet’s assume for a moment the intent was a good faith to make sure ALL legitimate votes are counted. PA Legislature codified what constitutes a legitmate ballot. Even in good faith, the PA SoS can’t change the law.
I don’t understand why the USSC let this go in the first place. Not much different than what happened in FL in 2000.
Crazy thing, if this goes to the house Trump could win. Each state gets one vote, and there are more red states than blue.
-
November 12, 2020 at 4:29 pm #3600
Rocky17ParticipantCorrect, BD; therefore, that is why I have always been more than hopeful since moment one. I just feel certain this will end up with SCOTUS and just may be a 9-0 vote because it is so clear cut and non controversial.
-
November 12, 2020 at 7:19 pm #3602
Genuine RealistParticipantHow many ballots are at issue?
I wouldn't give you two cents for all your fancy rules if, behind them, they didn't have a little bit of plain, ordinary, everyday kindness - yeah, and a little looking out for the other fella, too.
-
November 12, 2020 at 7:47 pm #3603
Rocky17ParticipantGR, in this particular issue, possibly 30,000. In my other more recent post, at issue is probably between 700,000 and 1,000,000. What SCOPA and Secretary of State ruled was unconstitutional and was the prerogative only of the PA legislature. IF SCOTUS rules in Trump`s favor, as I understand it he would win the state by many hundreds of thousands of votes. He would still need either Georgia or Arizona if my count is correct to win as long as NC stays in his column.
I also happen to believe FWIW that Wisconsin is very much in play due to fraudulent ballots.
-
November 12, 2020 at 8:31 pm #3605
Genuine RealistParticipantAs I thought. Biden has a 55,000 vote plurality in Pennsylvania. Even if all 30,000 were cast for him, he still wins. Alito’s order segregating the ballots was one of the wisest in Supreme Court history.
He also has 290 Electoral College votes, out of 507 accounted for. Georgia and North Carolina are still in theory outstanding. Biden leads in Georgia by 24,000, a large enough margin to make it extremely unlikely that a recount will change anything. (The plain fact of the matter is that most poll workers are volunteers, salt of the earth types more interested in doing the job right than the outcome.) The largest swing ever recorded on a recount is 1100. Biden is going to win Georgia, too,which gives him 306, or more than enough even without Pennsylvania – which he will win.
You are following these suits very closely. You are thus aware that one after another, these claims of widespread fraud are being blown up as ridiculously petty. In Arizona, Trump litigators wanted the records sealed to prevent the public fr0m finding out just how few votes were actually at stake. The trial court wanted none of that, and revealed that the grand conspiracy involved 180 votes at most.That’s typical.
Trump has never looked worse. Even if he was confident of ultimate victory, common courtesy is to treat the announced winner with respect. The good of the country demands it. His level of denial approaches the psychotic. But he’s not psychotic. What he’s doing is deliberately winding up his supporters to believe in conspiratist nonsense, despite the utter absence of malfeasance and only the petty acts of nonfeasance you might expect in an election with over 150 million ballots. Human error does happen, but at too trivial a level to affect the outcome.
And you are falling for it,hook, line and sinker. Don’t.
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by
Genuine Realist.
I wouldn't give you two cents for all your fancy rules if, behind them, they didn't have a little bit of plain, ordinary, everyday kindness - yeah, and a little looking out for the other fella, too.
-
November 13, 2020 at 12:57 am #3612
rjnwmillParticipantWould you?
”Trump has never looked worse. Even if he was confident of ultimate victory, common courtesy is to treat the announced winner with respect. The good of the country demands it.”
After the FISA abuse? After Biden proposed the use of the Logan Act in the Flynn frame? After Schiff lied his ass off about Russia collusion, falsely citing the sealed testimony of 50 Obama administration officials? After the disclosures about Biden Inc; his son, his brother & his sister? After Joe flat out lied about “never talking to his son about his business”?
I don’t think that treating the “winner” with undeserved respect is demanded for the “good of the country”. To the contrary, I think the appointment of a hard nosed special counsel to look into the laptops and money laundering and to take over the Durham investigation is in the best interests of the country. Screw this coverup of the games played by our DC betters. We should do better than settling for this shit.
Here's a toast with one last pour, may it last forever and a minute more;
Good fortune seems to you have sung, to live and love way past long
-
This reply was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.