Mick1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 650 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Radical proposals #10082
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Something here for everyone to dislike. I don’t like the idea of bringing consumer finance onto the government balance sheet any more than I liked bringing student loans into it. Student loans became the next political patronage lever, imagine if every single consumer had government debt that politicians can play “vote buying” with I want far fewer people dependent on the government for their financial well being, not far more!

    Oh, I agree. All I’m saying is that it would immediately put a lot of money back into consumer’s pockets, turn into a revenue source for a government that desperately needs it and completely screw Wall Street which has been preying upon consumers for…a very long time. And the fact is, no entity can force you to pay like the government can. They track you the entire way.

    • This reply was modified 1 year ago by Mick1Mick1.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10074
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    BTW, Trump’s trade war is crushing Russia economically. Their signature export is oil (almost 30% of their revenue), and Trump’s administration is forcing the price of oil downwards. Russian Urals grade (their best) slumped to $52.76 per barrel. Russia’s 2025 govt budget assumed an average oil price of $69.70 per barrel. This is going to hurt Russia’s ability to borrow money to finance the war. At least the USA pays back its debt on time, Russia has already defaulted on some of its foreign debt as of June 2022. And Trump’s tariffs means other countries slow down their purchases of oil and gas from Moscow.

    Russia’s Central Bank already has interest rates at 21%. Their housing market is grappling with soaring interest rates and curtailed state subsidies for first time buyers. New car sales are at their lowest in a decade. Rail freight traffic is down 20%. Everyone who can afford to leave has made for the border.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10073
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Great question. American economic might is the answer. Build our own businesses right on our shores. Prevent the mercantilist notions of other countries (I’m looking at you, China). If it’s bought here, it’s built here.

    I didn’t even mention the encroachment of artificial intelligence and ensuing loss of jobs.

    But how, how to require that we shrink the trade deficit and build more private employment, while shrinking inefficient government? If only there were a way to eliminate government payrolls, make government more efficient, discourage foreign suppliers and encourage Americans to buy American.

    It’s a conundrum.

    Not really. Trump is doing it. Man does the Left hate that he’s succeeding.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10070
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Trump is trying to reverse generations of economic, political, international and military mismanagement. He needs to address a skyrocketing Federal deficit that is by far the highest in history relative to GDP, a jaw-dropping trade deficit that nearly doubled under Biden’s watch, two generations’ worth of manufacturing jobs that left our shores for that of our enemies, a demographic time bomb of social security, a debt-laden consumer that can’t afford to spend any more, the highest inflation (self-inflicted, BTW) in two generations, a vastly-overextended military and warlike predecessors, and to top it all off, an absolute, total and complete immigration disaster.

    There is not a single area of American life that isn’t screaming out to be improved.

    I can’t wait for BYT’s solution as to How Trump Should Have Fixed All The Crap Left Behind By Biden And Generations Of Democrat-Controlled Administrations.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Updated – List of SF Closings #10068
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Here’s the updated list. Please note, although Rolex and Richemont have closed in the mall, they’ve invested in nearby Union Square. Rolex recently opened a showroom with Kerns Fine Jewelry at 255 Post St., and Richemont’s A. Lange & Söhne division opened at 140 Geary St. Separately, Breitling opened its own watch store last year at 299 Post St.

    Please note, Zara did close its 20k space, but is reopening as a 40k space.

    New closings in bold:

    1. 24-Hour Fitness
    2. A Miner Miracle Shop
    3. Abercrombie & Fitch
    4. Adidas
    5. Agent Provocateur
    6. Aldo
    7. Alessi
    8. Alexander McQueen
    9. AllSaints
    10. Amazon Go
    11. American Eagle Outfitters
    12. Amy Kuschel Bride
    13. Anthropologie
    14. Archive
    15. Arc’teryx
    16. AT&T
    17. Athleta
    18. Babette
    19. Banana Republic
    20. Bank of America (brand on 1 Market Street)
    21. Barneys New York
    22. Bed Bath & Beyond
    23. Benefit
    24. Bloom Room, The
    25. Bloomingdale’s
    26. Brooks Brothers
    27. Bucherer / Rolex
    28. Burke Williams Spa
    29. California Girl Jewelry
    30. Camper Shoes
    31. CB2
    32. Christian Louboutin
    33. Cinemark Multiplex
    34. Coach
    35. Coco Republic Furniture
    36. Cole Haan
    37. Container Store, The
    38. Crate & Barrel
    39. Crunch Gym
    40. Cuyana
    41. CVS Pharmacy
    42. Denny’s
    43. Diana Slavin
    44. Diesel
    45. Disney Store
    46. DSW/Designer Shoe Warehouse
    47. eDressit
    48. Ethos
    49. Express
    50. Façonnable
    51. Farinelli Decorative Arts
    52. First Republic Bank
    53. Forever 21
    54. Forum
    55. Gallery of Jewels
    56. GameStop
    57. Gap, The
    58. Goorin Brothers
    59. Green Arcade Bookstore
    60. G-Star
    61. H&M
    62. Harputs
    63. Hilton Union Square
    64. Hollister
    65. Huntington
    66. Icebreaker
    67. In-N-Out Burger
    68. IWC Schaffhausen
    69. J. Crew
    70. Jamba Juice
    71. Jeffrey’s Toys
    72. Jimmy Choo
    73. Jimmy Choo Men’s
    74. Jin Wang Bridal
    75. Jins Eyewear
    76. John Varvatos
    77. Johnny Was
    78. Jos. A. Bank Clothier
    79. Journeys
    80. Kate Spade
    81. Klaus Murer Swiss Jeweler
    82. Kohl’s (27 closings nationwide)
    83. KPMG – Leaving their $400 million name building
    84. L’Occitane
    85. La Cocina
    86. La Perla
    87. Lego Stores
    88. Lily Samii Collection
    89. Longchamp
    90. Lucky Brand
    91. Lululemon
    92. Lush
    93. Macy’s
    94. Madewell
    95. Makeshop by Brit + Co.
    96. Margaret O’Leary
    97. Marlowe
    98. Marmot
    99. Marni
    100. Marshall’s
    101. MCM Worldwide
    102. Mephisto
    103. Merrell
    104. Michael Kors
    105. New Balance
    106. Nordstrom – Closing all San Francisco stores, not just Union Square
    107. Nordstrom Rack
    108. North Face
    109. Oakley
    110. Office Depot
    111. Old Navy
    112. Omega
    113. Ordinary, The | DECIEM
    114. Panerai
    115. Paper Source
    116. Parc 55
    117. Psycho Bunny
    118. Rae | Costumes
    119. Ray Ban
    120. Razer
    121. RealReal, The
    122. Richemont
    123. Ria’s Shoes
    124. Rims & Goggles
    125. Rolex
    126. Saks Off Fifth
    127. Scotch & Soda
    128. See’s Candies
    129. Sentiero
    130. Sephora
    131. Seven Eleven
    132. Shreve & Company Jewelers
    133. Starbuck’s (Two closings three more by 2025)
    134. Steve Madden
    135. Subway
    136. Sunglass Hut
    137. Taco Bell
    138. Target
    139. Ted Baker
    140. The Body Shop
    141. Theory
    142. Thomas Pink
    143. Tina’s Jewelry
    144. T-Mobile
    145. Tourbillon Boutique
    146. TSE
    147. TUMI
    148. Uniglo
    149. V Boutique
    150. Vans
    151. Veo Optics
    152. Vilebrequin
    153. Walgreen’s (closed five SF stores in late 2021, twelve by 2025)
    154. Warby Parker
    155. Westfield Mall
    156. Whole Foods
    157. Williams Sonoma
    158. Wolford
    159. World of Charms
    160. Yotel
    161. Zadig & Voltaire
    162. Zara
    163. Zumiez

     

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10066
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Here’s a partial solution, one that’s been supported by two politicians as different as Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump:

    1. Have the Federal Government buy the consumer’s debt and turn it into a term loan with fixed repayment terms.
    2. Charge the consumer LIBOR + 1% instead of the usurious rates charged by Wall Street.
    3. Presto: the consumer saves money, s/he develops better spending habits, the Federal Government gets another source of revenue valued at $1.5 trillion (the difference between consumer credit card/personal loan/payday loan interest rates and LIBOR+1%).

    The only negative is that it sticks it to the part of Wall Street that soaks Main Street.

    Sounds like a win-win-win-win to me…

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10063
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    This is what I love, love, love about Lefties. Hoover was in office, so he created The Great Depression.

    No, they don’t mention the financial speculation that happened throughout the 1920s (Hoover didn’t take office until 1929). They don’t mention the buying of consumer goods en masse  on credit, which happened throughout the 1920s. They don’t mention the 67% increase in the money supply between 1921 and 1929 which led to overinvestment.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Trump To Punish States For Not Ceding Election Authority #10062
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    I remember when the Democratic Party nominated Joe Biden, the only moderate among Warren / Sanders / Kamala / Beto / Buttigieg / Bloomberg / Marianne / Klobuchar / Tulsi / Yang / Patrick / Kraus / De La Fuente / Steyer / Booker and about a dozen others. The Democrats knew and understood that America was a centrist country, and only Biden could beat Trump, and only under circumstances where, say, a once-in-a-century global pandemic that originated halfway around the world could be blamed on Trump and a visibly failing Joe Biden could run for President under tightly controlled circumstances, let’s say, from a basement.

    And then, the rest of the Democratic world pretended, post-election, that Joe Biden was not non compos mentis. And the talking heads/ Big Media / Big Academia / Silicon Valley / Hollywood / BigLaw / BigLabor all lauuuuughed and laaaaaaaaughed as their long-past-his-prime, doddering old fool of a President, easily led by Progressives enacted their radical agenda to the detriment of America. They printed money, they closed America for business, they kept children out of school and with a collective straight face, they and Lady MacBiden looked into the camera and promised that Joe Biden was of sound mind and body, knowing the entire time that the ol’ brain synapses just weren’t firing, but they didn’t care because without a working, functioning President, they could let slip the dogs of Democratic war and completely undermine the country with funding for the most ridiculous, stupidest, out-of-left-field causes that you literally couldn’t make that shit up.

    And then, with four months to go, and Biden literally unable to form a cogent thought, the Democrats needed another President who was as broadly, ridiculously FAR FAR LEFT as the people pulling Biden’s puppet strings, so they nominated an SF/Berkeley far Left Progressive who was considered the most Left Senator by GovTrack, even more left than Bernie Sanders. This candidate ended up repudiating all of her prior positions, including:

    1. Defund the police
    2. Donate for bail for the MN rioters
    3. Against plastic straws
    4. Against fracking (she claims she’s been for fracking since 2020…but she lied, she didn’t support it, she only said at the time that Joe Biden was for it).
    5. Against off-shore drilling
    6. Against the American pipeline.
    7. For decriminalization of illegal border crossings.
    8. Called for getting rid of ICE.
    9. Against private health insurance/medicare for all (she sponsored the darn bill, even the left-wing Urban Institute claimed it would cost $34 trillion over a decade, and would have kicked 180 million people off of private insurance)/Single Payer
    10. Green New Deal (she supported AOC’s version in the Senate)
    11. Mandatory gun buy-back programs, banning of AR-15s.
    12. Supporting packing the Supreme Court
    13. Federal jobs guarantee

    The panicking Dems realized that they needed this half-wit in the White House, otherwise, the country would find out the perfidy that had been going on in Biden’s name. You know, Joe Biden, about whom Obama once said “Never underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to fuck it up.” So they raised over a billion dollars and outspent Trump 5:1…and the American people caught on to the fact that Kamala Harris was an incipient disaster.

    And so they voted in Orange Man Bad.

    And now you get articles from Big Media who claim they knew it all along that Joe Biden had lost it.

    We were right: New books expose truth about Biden’s failing health

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    You have a curious definition of “not standing up to” and “continues bending over backwards for…”

    Where do I begin? I will have to post more another time, but just look at the latest economic “plan”. He put tariffs on most of the world, but (surprise) he left off Russia and it’s pet — Belarus. But sure enough, he put tariffs on Ukraine. Because of course he did. Of course, you could say he didn’t need to put tariffs on Russia or Belarus because we hardly trade with them. But that explanation flies out the window when you see that he put tariffs on Nauru — that tiny island of a few thousand poor people that have almost zero GDP and no trade. He even imposed tariffs on an island inhabited mostly by American soldiers.

    I’ve been watching Democrats complain about the tariffs for a few weeks now. Tell me, who said this:

    “It’s proper for advanced economies like the United States to introduce reciprocity with countries that are no longer poor countries, like China to make sure they’re providing access to their markets” and “the average tariff on Chinese goods is 2% whereas the average tariff on American goods coming into China is 35%. Chinese trade is a job loser (for Americans).”

    If you guessed Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi, you’d be correct.

    Democrats condemn Trump on many things, but internally, they agree on his trade policy. Trump has always been more aligned with Democrats than Republicans on trade. Lefty Dems criticized NAFTA for years for the same arguments that Trump made.

    Fundamentally…and this is something that lawyers and Democrats don’t understand…it’s a negotiating tactic. That’s it. You have to put meaning and substance behind it, which Trump is doing. Some countries (Switzerland and Vietnam) are already caving. We’ve always treated the huge American market as a gift for the rest of the world, while the rest of the world screws us. Finally, a businessman who knows how to negotiate.

    Democrats align with Trump on trade policy

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Updated – List of SF Closings #10056
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    And in the category of “All-time, all-clueless” we can position Governor Newsom’s portrait, who announced that “California is OPEN FOR BUSINESS!”

    Interesting approach. He is directing California companies to pursue strategic partnerships with foreign trading partners, and asking that California companies be exempted from retaliatory tariffs.

    That, and the prick says that agriculture is the engine of the state economy, after he and the Democrats have done everything possible to ruin agriculture. Drive down highway 5, Mr. Governor. Yeah, we’re open for business. Especially with the country’s second highest unemployment rate (after Nevada), tied with other Democratic strongholds Michigan, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia.

    White House spokesperson Kush Desai offered Newsom some excellent advice, stating that Gov. Newsom should focus on “out-of-control homelessness, crime, regulations, and unaffordability in California instead of trying his hand at international dealmaking.”

    Newsom to world: California open for business

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Sounding the alarm on AOC #10055
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    AOC is in the lead over Chuck Schumer. 55% of NY stone idiot voters back AOC, 36% back Schumer. This for the 2028 primary.

    Poll: AOC leads Schumer in head-to-head New York primary matchup by double digits

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Will Kamala Harris run for California Governor? #10054
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Kamala Harris will make her decision to run for California Governor by end of the summer. Former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra (former BIden official) announced his CA gubernatorial run on Wednesday.

    Kamala Harris: ‘I’m not going anywhere’

    Early polls show that 57% of California stone idiot voters support Harris. Former Rep. Katie Porter has 9%. Speaker of the CA Assembly show Villaraigosa and the current Lt. Gov. Kounalaki at 4% each.

    Kamala Harris is Democratic front-runner for California governor in 2026: Poll

    Here’s the really fun part. Nearly half of all Californians are considering voting for a Republican. In fact, Californians are trending toward more conservative viewpoints:

    • 73% in favor of Prop 36 and tougher drug and theft laws.
    • 72% see homelessness as a huge problem
    • 71% say Democratic leadership haven’t addressed cost of living issues
    • 60% oppose free healthcare for undocumented immigrants
    • only 24% think transgender males should compete in female sports.

    New Poll Finds Half of All Californians Now Considering a GOP Candidate For Governor 2026 – California Globe

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10053
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Jobs report just came out. Expected jobs was 120,000, actual new jobs in March were 155,000, significant increase from 84,000 jobs added in February. Wage growth for those staying in their positions increased 4.6%, those who changed jobs experienced a 6.5% increase.

    Currently, the number of open positions matches the number of available workers, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    U.S. private sector adds 155,000 jobs

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    in reply to: Bueller #10052
    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    Trump is an economic arsonist and you’re just casually trying to explain it away as if he has some rational economic approach. I mean, I don’t even know how to respond. It’s like trying to debate with someone who is defending a terrorist and expecting to have a reasonable conversation. I simply cannot fathom how you and others on the right don’t see how absolutely fucking insane this administration’s policies are — economic and otherwise.

    Not being casual, just using first-week-of-Econ-101 Economics. I already know you lost, given the names/epithets you’re using. You don’t want a normal, reasoned argument…because you can’t have one.

    I’m not saying it will work, I’m saying that’s the reasoning behind his approach. And no…the economy wasn’t humming. We were spending via credit card, both consumers AND the government…and Biden turned a $527 Bils. trade deficit into a $978 bils. trade deficit in just four years, in part because he shut down the economy for two years.

    BTW, Clinton lost us millions of manufacturing jobs. MILLIONS. Never heard you complain about Clinton.

    Jobs reshored since 2010 are 1.6 million.

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

    Mick1Mick1
    Participant

    You have a curious definition of “not standing up to” and “continues bending over backwards for…”

    Where do I begin? I will have to post more another time, but just look at the latest economic “plan”. He put tariffs on most of the world, but (surprise) he left off Russia and it’s pet — Belarus. But sure enough, he put tariffs on Ukraine. Because of course he did. Of course, you could say he didn’t need to put tariffs on Russia or Belarus because we hardly trade with them. But that explanation flies out the window when you see that he put tariffs on Nauru — that tiny island of a few thousand poor people that have almost zero GDP and no trade. He even imposed tariffs on an island inhabited mostly by American soldiers.

     

    But…you didn’t know this when I posted. Wondered why it took you so long to respond…

    Audaces fortuna iuvat

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 650 total)