Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1816452521059303553
Information laundering / setting up the Trump lies narrative.
https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1816150595096416552
Cleanup on aisle 5.
https://x.com/MikeKBerg/status/1816180437456474330
Convenient for a Democrat primary. Not so good for a national election.
https://x.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1816094306765266945
Already seeing it on TikTok, X, and other social media. The number of laudatory legacy media pieces is incredible, including a bunch of 180s by pro-Biden reporters who wrote hit pieces when Biden and Harris were engaged in a cold war early in the administration (how do you think she ended up as Border Czar?).
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1815596560664891498
It’s all pre-ordained.
https://x.com/Politics_Polls/status/1815804888422703461
So long as polls make victory plausible, any amount of *ahem* irregularities will be swept under the rug / there will be a lack of standing to challenge anything.
The record she has, if she isn’t subbed in through the 25th Amendment, is: Border Czar (failure); sent to Europe to prevent the invasion (provoked Putin, Russia invaded the next day); on climate, kicked off a conspiracy theory by saying we need to reduce population to achieve climate goals. She was also rated more liberal / left than Bernie Sanders in her short time in the Senate.
She is the poster child for the California Democrats’ system of failing up.
We’ll see how it goes.
https://x.com/Politics_Polls/status/1813358076868653239
Updated. Biden now w/ a 53% chance of winning. A reminder:
538’s forecast is based on a combination of polls and campaign “fundamentals,” such as economic conditions, state partisanship and incumbency. It’s not meant to “call” a winner, but rather to give you a sense of how likely each candidate is to win. Check out our methodology to learn exactly how we calculate these probabilities.
This has been this way since the Great Leap Forward. It’s one of the reasons why the great famine happened, because local officials were under such pressure to meet steel quotas and industrial targets. The imperial Chinese states also relied on local levies and taxation, but not to the current extent.
