Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
7,14 or 20 M votes didn’t disappear. That is not the question. My question, echoed by others, is where did Biden’s wide margin of victory come from in 2020?
I am not a conspiracy theory guy, but damn, I’m still waiting on any reasonable explanation for the difference. (Not counting voter fraud)
Wait- What? I thought it was just rich Republican developers that stiffed the little guy.
Must be Russian dis-information.
Hard not to call this a Red Wave. Gained seats in the Senate, House and won 8 gubernatorial elections.
Interesting comparison to 2020.
81M for Biden, 74M for Trump.
2024,
72M for Trump and 67M for Harris. Meaning nothing, it’s odd the difference in Bidens and Harris’s total is roughly the same number of votes Biden received in the this years primary.
More than curious is almost 15M voters who voted for Biden chose to sit this one out. 15M? Harris couldn’t even rally enough support from Biden’s base to win? How does that happen?
What’s sad is libs continue harping about the US running elections like a 3rd world country.
Downtown Portland is boarded up. Storekeeper, when questioned why, stated “in case Trump wins”.
WTF. Looks like we have already cleared the bar for running elections like a 3rd world country. Or like France.
“….but especially the fascistic MAGA insanity that has taken over Congress and the Republican Party. I don’t understand how you guys don’t see it. You certainly see it clearly on the left, but you have a blind spot on the right.”
LoL. The right isn’t blind, it’s just weary of left declaring every Republican candidate since Goldwater a Nazi or fascist. It’s old news and no longer registers with a lot of people.
Want a blind spot – for four years dems hid Biden’s condition. He didn’t just lose his fastball 3 months ago.
Want another blind spot- the left calling out conservatives for supporting Trump, when the liberal candidate is so awful conservatives are faced with a choice of awful or empty. (Mick’s description). All of the bad things leftists predicted if Trump were elected in 2016 failed to happen. It will be the same again in this election, unless you want to count anticipated riots when Trump wins.
[quote quote=9259]I saw this on twitter when it happened. How is it even possibly explainable? They should be investigated for election interference if you ask me.[/quote]
Well, a simple apology with a statement “it was and accident”. Sure it was an accident. It was an accident that it aired a week early.
I think it safe to say Libs are the modern day Jacobins.
Interesting take. More to the point, it’s Harris pandering to Muslims. She is losing – if she has not out right lost – the Muslim vote in Michigan.
This election is shaping up to look like the last two. No one is voting FOR either candidate, they are voting against a candidate.
Trump could win this election by the largest margin since Reagan rolled Carter if he only slightly less offensive. I can’t wait for this election to be over.
The media set her up to fail? How about her own handlers set her to fail by refusing to let interviewers ask the obvious question. Talk about missing the elephant in the room! How do you not anticipate that question?
She would be better off to say that night was an awakening for her and she stepped in to save Biden’s legacy. No one would believe her, but at least she’s got a plausible response to the question.
Even if it a landslide, libs will be in denial wondering how they could have lost the election. My answer will be, like it was in 2016, put up someone worth voting for and YOU win by a landslide.
On another note, loved these lines from the Telegraph.
Let’s just say that none appears to be a poster child for masculinity. The comments have been brutal. “Zero testosterone was used in the making of this ad”; “A Real Man instantly realises that there isn’t a single Real Man in this pathetic beta male cringe-fest of a propaganda video”; “From the party that can’t tell you what a woman is”; “As a man, I think I walked away from this ad with a yeast infection.”IMO, she would have been better off wearing a leather catsuit while claiming she was helping corner the sex worker voting block.
This is not the first time Whitmer had a dust up with organized religion. https://upnorthlive.com/news/local/churches-file-lawsuit-against-whitmer-for-violating-first-amendment-rights-during-covid-19
It’s always fun to re-visit her Covid policies. https://www.thecentersquare.com/michigan/article_f43c7e72-c1be-11ed-92bd-5b73e21f1b7c.html. I especially like the ban on operating motorboats and traveling to second homes, which her husband got caught violating shortly after she locked down the state.
I guess voters really are that stupid.
[quote quote=9187]This is based on their polling cross tabs and past errors. Surprisingly, Fox News polls historically lean left as well. https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=3e6ea178-de03-4c61-b477-8ed92a236809[/quote]
Good article.
Laughed at this ….”The reliability of the Fox News polling data has not been enough to reverse the DNC’s decision to shut the channel out of the primary debates. DNC Chairman Tom Perez has said he respects the Washington correspondents at Fox News but believes the network’s overall slant favors the Republicans. ”
Well, duh. Much better to have CBS continue with it’s long history slanting and spinning news stories and interviews that someone get “wrongly edited.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/cbs-news-casts-long-shadow-090059150.html
