Mick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 550 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pay your fair share #4698
    MickMick
    Participant

    We declined both the first and second round of the PPP.  Instead, we canned about 23% of our overall staff, took 15% haircuts, and zeroed out all discretionary and semi-discretionary budgets starting last April.  Our partners made a sxxt ton of money.

    This year, at April month end, we were up over 32% in gross revenue comparing April 21 to April 20, and we are up about 24% year over year in the first four months.

    Crazy.

    in reply to: Pay your fair share #4693
    MickMick
    Participant

    we lobby; we concentrate power; we give our political stooges a raise; we contribute hundreds of millions to targeted get out the vote efforts to protect our puppets.

    Apropos of nothing, I worked with an extremely talented consultant who had been both a lobbyist and an attorney, and was using his MBA to further the interests of the Fortune 100 (all Ivy degrees).

    He told me that I would be astounded at the low intellect of a large number of the members of Congress, and essentially that we deserved what we received by electing our political leaders through a popularity contest — which did not end in a meritocratic result by any stretch.

    BTW Janet Yellen thinks the results of the borrow-and-spend strategy will be just ducky fine:

    Yellen insists U.S. will see ‘big returns’ by passing Biden spending proposals (msn.com)

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 11 months ago by MickMick.
    • This reply was modified 4 years, 11 months ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: SEC Enforcement officer resigns after 2 weeks #4680
    MickMick
    Participant

    makes you wonder how Kamala kept her job, given her prosecutorial zeal?

    Also, I’d idly wondered whether Strzok’s side squeeze Lisa Page ever apologized to his wife, Ms. Hodgeman.  Apparently not:

    https://www.nny360.com/opinion/columns/christine-m-flowers-lisa-page-owes-an-apology-to-peter-strzok-s-wife/article_faa91aec-21cd-5cbb-b6db-111030f6b4dc.html

    in reply to: Biden’s ratings after 100 days in office #4644
    MickMick
    Participant

    Kamala Harris will be a spectacularly bad President when they finally decide to use the 25th amendment on him.  She has zero chops for this line of work.  How the rest of the world will take advantage of that twit.

    in reply to: Biden’s ratings after 100 days in office #4642
    MickMick
    Participant

    I think Pew games the polls less than others.  Accurate?  I don’t know about that.

    in reply to: New AP Stylebook, thanks to Kamala Harris… #4636
    MickMick
    Participant

    I genuinely write this with love and respect, but this article describes my mother to an absolute T.

    in reply to: Huh? Per Biden: Floyd > MLK #4610
    MickMick
    Participant

    This is not a formal database, but it’s interesting nonetheless. It purports to track people killed in the custody of police.  It’s kept in a Google sheet, and you can track by ethnicity, state, county, agency involved, gender, name, and date range.

    http://www.fatalencounters.org

    According to the database, there’s been about 10k caucasians killed in police custody, 6,600 african americans, about 4,000 latinos.

    Data on deaths in police custody haven’t been formally required until the Death in Custody Act of 2013. 

    Click to access e1901.pdf

    in reply to: Just for fun… #4604
    MickMick
    Participant

    That may be so, but the Dems threw the kitchen sink at Trump so who knows what was posturing for Biden’s removal. We live in such a bizarre time. Whatever the parties say is right gets taken as right. Orwell was so spot on that I actually don’t think much of this is new. biden is definitely testing his political capital. It’s unlikely he has the votes for the tax schemes he is hoping for, and if it’s tried before the midterms he definitely won’t have the votes after. That’s especially true if somebody actually tells the “working class” that all these taxes on the rich guys fall to them, too, in terms of more expensive cost of living.

    You bring up a good point. The Dems are likely to get crushed in the midterms, given all the Progressive steps that Biden has taken to mollify the extreme left.  There’s going to be a lot of turnover at that time.  All 435 House Seats and 34 of the 100 Senate seats will be up for grabs.  And the 2020 elections were a good signpost.  There were five vacancies and one Libertarian in 2020.  After the election, all the vacancies and the Libertarian and 11 others became Republicans.

    Biden knows that he needs to get as much done as possible between now and the first Tuesday in November, 2022…just 19 short months away.  The Republicans will play defense as much as they possibly can.

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: Just for fun… #4588
    MickMick
    Participant

    I don’t think history will look favorably on Biden or Obama. And only one of them can run for cover behind his ethnicity.

    True.  The other will need to claim senility, which, fortunately, is a legitimate claim. He sounds like he’s had at least one stroke.  Not sure why Obama picked him, candidly.

    And just as an aside, while speaking of VPs, lefties used to joke that Dan Quayle was impeachment insurance for Bush.  And McCain’s selection of Governor Palin was a bit of a head scratcher.  But to me, the all-time bad choice is Kamala Harris.

    Harris had just 129 votes in New Hampshire.  Even Donald Trump had 1,217 write in votes in the Democratic primaries in NH, 10x what Harris had as a running Democrat.  She was bitter, and shrill with the best maniacal laugh since Howard Dean embarrassed himself in the 2004 primaries.  And she’ll be our President once Biden can no longer dress himself and his handler’s can’t understand him.

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: Just for fun… #4585
    MickMick
    Participant

    I really don’t think we have appreciated the international calm that was the trump admin. No new wars, troop drawdowns, isis from problem to footnote, Iran in its place, and NATO paying for itself. If not for the domestic disturbances and divisions fomented and embraced by the opposition, it was a pretty good time. Those were bad but largely fomented at least passively by the opposition.

    Don’t forget the fact that the American Embassy in Israel moved to Jerusalem after literally decades of Democrats paying lip service to the move but failing to actually move the embassy.

    On Biden’s watch, things are falling apart internationally, but I think my favorite part was the Canadian Prime Minster orally servicing Joe Biden with his lapdog compliments of America’s “seeking to repair” the American-Canadian alliance, just as Biden decides to eliminate the XL Keystone pipeline and destroy 1,000 Canadian jobs and 11,000 American jobs.  Awesome.

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: Monitoring marine movement globally real time #4553
    MickMick
    Participant

    Just the other day, my 14 year old daughter and I were laughing at a $227k Lamborghini SUV. Just the idea of one is ridiculous at best, and at that price tag, ludicrous at worst.

    Wonder how she’d feel about a $12 million+ Rolls Royce Sweptail:

    https://www.motor1.com/news/146815/rolls-royce-sweptail-expensive-ever/

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: Impeachment 2 #4539
    MickMick
    Participant

    The fact remains that, had it not been for the coronavirus, in all likelihood, Trump would still be President.” You think the Chinese were smart enough to design and execute a plan to influence the election?

     

    I think the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, Panamanians and Pomeranians (and all other countries and dog species) all designed and executed plans to affect the 2020 American Presidential election.  Everyone wanted a piece and they have for many years.  In fact, I was in a London hotel room during the 2008 U.S. Presidential election, and the BBC interviewed a (future) Karen in the City of London who opined on the 2008 American Presidential Election that “the problem with the American Presidential Election is that it is too consequential to be left solely up to Americans.”  Looooooove that quote, almost as much as I love the fact that tons and tons of worldly American Elites feel basically the same way.

    But that’s what’s behind the desire of countries to influence leadership votes in other countries, and Lord knows, we have had an outsized impact on the elections in other countries.

    The question, to me, is not whether other countries designed and executed plans to affect the outcome of ourPresidential election.  It’s whether they’re successful.  Our naivete is striking in that we take such (hypocritical) offense at their efforts, though their interest in who becomes our President should be abundantly clear.

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
    in reply to: Biden’s Border Challenge #4535
    MickMick
    Participant

    Don’t forget the fact that he had a scripted list of friendly reporters on which to call.  Fox reporter didn’t get called on.

    in reply to: Democrat Happy Camps #4525
    MickMick
    Participant

    [quote quote=4503]Under Trump: Racist cages for kids Under Biden: Happy slumber parties (behind plastic walls) https://www.foxnews.com/politics/photos-crowded-migrant-holding-center-texas-democratic-congressman Jesus politics sucks. The Dems are painfully cynical on this topic.[/quote]

    I don’t have the link, but the NYT has an article this morning on why news is all negative, even when there’s good news.  They specifically pointed out a year’s worth of focus on bad news COVID-19 coverage.

    Dear NYT: The real reason you focused on a year of bad news was because you were doing your level best to torpedo a sitting President.  Amazingly, it took the combined efforts of the media elite, the political elite, the business elite and a once-in-a-century pandemic to torch what had been a very successful President (who is a genuinely bad guy, Orange Man Bad, I get all that.

    in reply to: Impeachment 2 #4491
    MickMick
    Participant

    I wonder if Stanford grad Rachel Maddow is ever even slightly embarrassed over her falsehoods?

    https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbf3bd77e-c490-4c8f-ad3d-882fc8908273_660x604.png

    She has no problem calling out Trump on his falsehoods, of which there are many.  But I don’t recall any pre-2020 election retractions by any of the media or Mr. Brennan over their own falsehoods about Trump.  And the fact that a journalist with both the background and leaning of Glenn Greenwald publishes this story is borderline unbelievable.

    The fact remains that, had it not been for the coronavirus, in all likelihood, Trump would still be President.

    • This reply was modified 5 years ago by MickMick.
Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 550 total)