Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yep, lots to love in Joe’s speech if you are lawyer. this will end up in the USSC just like the CDCs rent moratorium.
I stop listening when I heard – “This will protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated.”
Newsome’s outster means the end of life as we know it. Right.
I’m thinking it will be President Harris by November. I’m not sure who will pull the trigger, but Dems won’t be able to hide Joe’s lack of mental acuity much longer.
Well, it’s not like they are hiding it as much as ignoring it.
Haven’t been on the Cardboard for a long time. I found it was becoming a lot like Portland. Inclusive, welcoming, big tent stuff as long as one believes, speaks and dresses like everyone else. Perfect example of Hive mentality.
“The group of clowns in senior positions in this administration have got us FUBAR in six months…energy, the economy & inflation, the border, foreign policy, the CCP virus, election integrity…pretty impressive list, no?”
But they are checking all the boxes….
“Charles Boyle, the deputy communications director from Brown’s office, told the paper in an email that staff from the governor’s office informed legislative staffers about the bill’s signing on the day it was passed. He also said that the new standards for graduation will help benefit the state’s “Black, Latino, Latinx, Indigenous, Asian, Pacific Islander, Tribal, and students of color.””
OK, Charlie.Splain how this change helps anyone? 47% HS graduation rate, state 37 in public education, I can see how lowering the bar benefits the state leaders but little else.
buh bye Andy. Guess he finally got the memo his ass was toast, although he still claims this is all a political hit job. Where are the “All women must believed” and #metoo crowds?
If his last name was DeSantos, Cuomo would have been gone long ago.
[quote quote=4977]Pretty entertaining so far. I do enjoy beach volleyball. Best olympic sport ever.[/quote]
WOMENS’s beach volleyball.
Fixed that for ya’.
Obama stated as much on more than one occasion. Makes one wonder what the USSC was snorting when they ruled against Trump suspending DACA.
[quote quote=4902]Your views are important here. IIRC your son’s athletic aspirations came to an end due to injury? Would this program have been a material benefit to him? With the benefit of 20-20 hindsight, would this have altered his career path at all?[/quote]
Couple of things. He was miffed when he showed up on Madden College Football without knowing his name and # would be used. I don’t think this would have had a big benefit for #74, but a few extra bucks would have come in handy for rent not covered by Stanfords housing allowance.
Here is a lift from emails with Young Dawg.
“”I like Judge Kavanaugh’s take (his opinion starts on pg 41, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-512_gfbh.pdf):
“The NCAA’s business model would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America. All of the restaurants in a region cannot come together to cut cooks’ wages on the theory that “customers prefer” to eat food from low-paid cooks. Law firms cannot conspire to cabin lawyers’ salaries in the name of providing legal services out of a “love of the law.” Hospitals cannot agree to cap nurses’ income in order to create a “purer” form of helping the sick. News organizations cannot join forces to curtail pay to reporters to preserve a “tradition” of public-minded journalism. Movie studios cannot collude to slash benefits to camera crews to kindle a “spirit of amateurism” in Hollywood. Price-fixing labor is price-fixing labor. And price-fixing labor is ordinarily a textbook antitrust problem because it extinguishes the free market in which individuals can otherwise obtain fair compensation for their work. Businesses like the NCAA cannot avoid the consequences of price-fixing labor by incorporating price-fixed labor into the definition of the product. Or to put it in more doctrinal terms, a monopsony cannot launder its price-fixing of labor by calling it product definition.
The bottom line is that the NCAA and its member colleges are suppressing the pay of student athletes who collectively generate billions of dollars in revenues for colleges every year. Those enormous sums of money flow to seemingly everyone except the student athletes. College presidents, athletic directors, coaches, conference commissioners, and NCAA executives take in six- and seven-figure salaries. Colleges build lavish new facilities. But the student athletes who generate the revenues, many of whom are African American and from lower-income backgrounds, end up with little or nothing.
Everyone agrees that the NCAA can require student athletes to be enrolled students in good standing. But the NCAA’s business model of using unpaid student athletes to generate billions of dollars in revenue for the colleges raises serious questions under the antitrust laws. In particular, it is highly questionable whether the NCAA and its member colleges can justify not paying student athletes a fair share of the revenues on the circular theory that the defining characteristic of college sports is that the colleges do not pay student athletes. And if that asserted justification is unavailing, it is not clear how the NCAA can legally defend its remaining compensation rules.”
Will this be the end of college athletics? Probably not, college sports existed before, they’ll continue to exist after. Look to the smaller schools that don’t have powerhouse football and men’s basketball programs to drive top-line revenue.
I’m excited about this, and can’t wait for the follow-on lawsuits to be filed. The SC seems eager to dismantle the NCAA’s compensation rules – they just need people to file lawsuits with the appropriate legal arguments.””
Young Dawg
