Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hey Cardcrimson: As you can imagine, I don’t condone any of this stuff, but since you’re making it political, just a reminder that Trump joked about Pelosi’s husband at a rally (everyone laughed) after he was beaten with a hammer nearly to death — not to mention the guy was trying to kill the Speaker of the House.
Donald Trump Jr. also mocked the attack on Paul Pelosi by sharing a meme on social media. The meme depicted a Halloween costume consisting of underwear and a hammer, with the caption “Got my Paul Pelosi Halloween costume ready.”
Also from Trump Jr.:
The internet remains undefeated… Also if you switch out the hammer for a red feather boa you could be Hunter Biden in an instant
Also, a reminder that former President Trump also mused at a rally that the “Second Amendment people” could do something about Hillary Clinton choosing judges if she is elected president. Then then just a few weeks later he suggested her secret service detail should be removed “just to see what happens”.
Just a reminder that Trump told his Chief of Staff that Mike Pence deserved to be hanged.
A reminder that Trump called for Liz Chaney to face a military tribunal just the other day.
A reminder that Trump called for his former Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley to be executed.
A reminder that Trump reposted a disturbing baseball bat photo next to Alvin Bragg, and threatened “death and destruction” if he (Trump) was charged.
A reminder that Trump reposted an image of Joe Biden hogtied on the bed of a pick-up truck.
A reminder that Trump promised to pay the legal bills if his supporters beat up protesters. He suggested they remove protesters “on a stretcher”. And told them to “knock the crap out of him” regarding another protester. In a speech in 2017 he also told police officers not to be “too nice” when putting suspects into police vehicles, suggesting they should not protect suspects’ heads when placing them in the cars.
A reminder that Trump praised Congressman Greg Gianforte for body-slamming a reporter.
A reminder that during the George Floyd protests, Trump mused that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”
And finally it should be noted that the shooter yesterday was a registered Republican and a member of a conservative second-amendment group. Reporters also spoke to his classmates who recalled the shooter as a very conservative guy who would take the conservative side whenever any political issue came up. Quote from the classmate:
“He definitely was a conservative. It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate…. Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side.”
I heard he supposedly donated $15 to Act Blue (a Democratic organization), but apparently it was a donation made by a 69 year old guy with the same name.
Apparently the gunman had an obsession with Epstein and was looking for some kind of vengeance per one of his recent social media posts. Given Trump’s ties to Epstein, which have come into focus recently (more evidence and accusations about Trump), that’s the only explanation that makes sense to me.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by .
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by .
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Yes please. And take him off the ballot while they’re at it.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
One bright spot: the idea that Biden would be on amphetamines has been thoroughly debunked. 😯
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Biden favored to win in the latest 538 forecast:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
The whole thing is a hoax. Totally rigged. Corrupt judge.
By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Looks like I was right. 2000 Mules publisher pulled the film from all platforms.
Add it to the list of all the other bullshit conspiracies peddled by the right, as well as the election audits that found nothing meaningful, and the recounts that confirmed Biden’s victory.
The damage has been done, though. So the retraction and apology will have about as much impact as a fart in the wind.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Looks like the 2000 Mules thing is just more BS peddled by the right.
Of course he’s innocent until proven guilt, but: Former FBI informant charged with lying about the Bidens’ role in Ukraine business, undercutting GOP impeachment inquiry
He figured prominently in the impeachment and the film. In any case, the film has been debunked. Not that anyone should be surprised.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
An official statement from the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia holds Israel responsible for what has transpired due to its repeated provocations and deprivation of the rights of Palestinians.”
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Odd they you all seem to think there’s some subterfuge going on with this appointment.
Last year 33 Republican members of Congress wrote a letter to Merick Garland, specifically asking that Weiss be given special counsel status.
Weiss, however, had never asked for such standing until very recently, saying that his investigation never required it; he was not impeded by lack of such status. Nevertheless, as soon as he asked, it was granted… And now many of these 33 Congressmen are complaining that Weiss was granted special counsel status.
As a reminder, by the way, Weiss is a Republican attorney, appointed by Trump — and appointed while Joe was a private citizen. But somehow this is fishy? The more likely explanation is that after several years of investigating Hunter — not to mention Comer’s failed House investigation — there is not much to this story besides a drug addict who played up his family name, while his father was a private citizen.
Meanwhile, all the so-called whistleblowers who are going to “expose” the nefarious wrongdoing by President Biden somehow turn out to be missing, or turn out to be Russian oligarchs, or Chinese spies, or Iranian arms dealers. Or the “star witness” that is finally going to blow the lid off the case testifies that President Biden was actually not involved. And the 17 audio tapes that are going to “expose” Joe Biden are somehow never to be found. Odd that some of you think a guy who has dementia and his drug addict son are able to outwit a multiyear investigation and a Congressional investigation.
So far the biggest actual evidence of anything are some dick pics. You’ve got the inmates running the asylum in the House, but you’re worried about Biden’s son playing up his family name like every famous family has done since forever.
Meanwhile, the Trump family — who was actually representing our government — made off with billions from the Saudis, whose Prince had said he had Kushner “in his pocket”. But somehow a guy who has never been part of the Biden administration is the boogie man.
Where is the thread on the CEB talking about the $2 billion Kushner and Ivanka Trump got? Or the $400 million they made while working in the White House? Or the patents and copywrites they received from the Chinese government? Where is the thread talking about the many millions of dollars Trump pocketed from foreign governments who “rented” empty spaces in his buildings & hotels while he was President, and who over-paid for hotel rooms at Trump’s properties?
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
I didn’t miss that part. But I don’t think it’s evidence of a crime.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
“I’m sitting here with my father”
— drug addicted Hunter Biden on WhatsApp
Well I guess that’s proof that his father really was sitting there.
When was that WhatsApp message sent? Was that when Joe was a private citizen?
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Cornfed, I’ve been reading RJ’s replies going back many years to the original CEB. They always branch out into some off-topic crap. I don’t know if his mind works in mysterious ways or if he’s always just trying to change the subject. But it’s impossible to have a good faith argument with him about any topic.
I don’t have that problem with any other commenter here, whether I agree with them or not. Pardon me for pointing that out. Perhaps you can tell me what Tucker Carlson’s video had to do with whether or not Trump obstructed justice or should be held accountable.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Of course the culture around being gay has changed. When I was a kid it was stigmatized terribly. Liberals fought to change those attitudes. I thought we had gotten past that. But we now have the “war on woke”. And it sounds like you’re a true believe in this bs narrative that liberals are groomers.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
I watched the Tucker video. I can’t stomach that guy and his fake concern-voice, but I humored you. And what’s your point?
His complaint is about an “amorphous moral terror”. Meanwhile his own party is waging a massive culture “war on woke”. The irony of the video: conservatives have been running around passing laws against drag queens, trans, don’t say gay, casting liberals as groomers, etc. Meanwhile he complains about politicians accusing people of things they couldn’t define. And yet none of them can define what “woke” means.
The only thing I got out of that video was that Instagram needs better moderation and that Tucker is a massive hypocrite, unless he’s referring to conservatives, as well. Unlikely.
my conclusion: this has nothing to do with whether Trump is guilty or whether he should have been indicted. It’s another example of the bizarre tangents you go on, changing the subject, every time I have ever engaged with you.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 3 months ago by
