Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
One bright spot: the idea that Biden would be on amphetamines has been thoroughly debunked. đŻ
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Biden favored to win in the latest 538 forecast:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
The whole thing is a hoax. Totally rigged. Corrupt judge.
By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Looks like I was right. 2000 Mules publisher pulled the film from all platforms.
Add it to the list of all the other bullshit conspiracies peddled by the right, as well as the election audits that found nothing meaningful, and the recounts that confirmed Bidenâs victory.
The damage has been done, though. So the retraction and apology will have about as much impact as a fart in the wind.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Looks like the 2000 Mules thing is just more BS peddled by the right.
Of course he’s innocent until proven guilt, but:Â Former FBI informant charged with lying about the Bidensâ role in Ukraine business, undercutting GOP impeachment inquiry
He figured prominently in the impeachment and the film. In any case, the film has been debunked. Not that anyone should be surprised.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
An official statement from the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
âThe Kingdom of Saudi Arabia holds Israel responsible for what has transpired due to its repeated provocations and deprivation of the rights of Palestinians.â
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Odd they you all seem to think there’s some subterfuge going on with this appointment.
Last year 33 Republican members of Congress wrote a letter to Merick Garland, specifically asking that Weiss be given special counsel status.
Weiss, however, had never asked for such standing until very recently, saying that his investigation never required it; he was not impeded by lack of such status. Nevertheless, as soon as he asked, it was granted… And now many of these 33 Congressmen are complaining that Weiss was granted special counsel status.
As a reminder, by the way, Weiss is a Republican attorney, appointed by Trump — and appointed while Joe was a private citizen. But somehow this is fishy? The more likely explanation is that after several years of investigating Hunter — not to mention Comer’s failed House investigation — there is not much to this story besides a drug addict who played up his family name, while his father was a private citizen.
Meanwhile, all the so-called whistleblowers who are going to “expose” the nefarious wrongdoing by President Biden somehow turn out to be missing, or turn out to be Russian oligarchs, or Chinese spies, or Iranian arms dealers. Or the “star witness” that is finally going to blow the lid off the case testifies that President Biden was actually not involved. And the 17 audio tapes that are going to “expose” Joe Biden are somehow never to be found. Odd that some of you think a guy who has dementia and his drug addict son are able to outwit a multiyear investigation and a Congressional investigation.
So far the biggest actual evidence of anything are some dick pics. You’ve got the inmates running the asylum in the House, but you’re worried about Biden’s son playing up his family name like every famous family has done since forever.
Meanwhile, the Trump family — who was actually representing our government — made off with billions from the Saudis, whose Prince had said he had Kushner “in his pocket”. But somehow a guy who has never been part of the Biden administration is the boogie man.
Where is the thread on the CEB talking about the $2 billion Kushner and Ivanka Trump got? Or the $400 million they made while working in the White House? Or the patents and copywrites they received from the Chinese government? Where is the thread talking about the many millions of dollars Trump pocketed from foreign governments who “rented” empty spaces in his buildings & hotels while he was President, and who over-paid for hotel rooms at Trump’s properties?
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
I didnât miss that part. But I donât think itâs evidence of a crime.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
âIâm sitting here with my fatherâ
â drug addicted Hunter Biden on WhatsApp
Well I guess thatâs proof that his father really was sitting there.
When was that WhatsApp message sent? Was that when Joe was a private citizen?
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Cornfed, I’ve been reading RJ’s replies going back many years to the original CEB. They always branch out into some off-topic crap. I don’t know if his mind works in mysterious ways or if he’s always just trying to change the subject. But it’s impossible to have a good faith argument with him about any topic.
I don’t have that problem with any other commenter here, whether I agree with them or not. Pardon me for pointing that out. Perhaps you can tell me what Tucker Carlson’s video had to do with whether or not Trump obstructed justice or should be held accountable.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
Of course the culture around being gay has changed. When I was a kid it was stigmatized terribly. Liberals fought to change those attitudes. I thought we had gotten past that. But we now have the “war on woke”. And it sounds like you’re a true believe in this bs narrative that liberals are groomers.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
I watched the Tucker video. I canât stomach that guy and his fake concern-voice, but I humored you. And whatâs your point?
His complaint is about an âamorphous moral terrorâ. Meanwhile his own party is waging a massive culture âwar on wokeâ. The irony of the video: conservatives have been running around passing laws against drag queens, trans, donât say gay, casting liberals as groomers, etc. Â Meanwhile he complains about politicians accusing people of things they couldnât define. And yet none of them can define what âwokeâ means.
The only thing I got out of that video was that Instagram needs better moderation and that Tucker is a massive hypocrite, unless heâs referring to conservatives, as well. Unlikely.
my conclusion: this has nothing to do with whether Trump is guilty or whether he should have been indicted. Itâs another example of the bizarre tangents you go on, changing the subject, every time I have ever engaged with you.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
One update on my opinion. I thought Trump would be held accountable. But he got lucky and drew Aileen Cannon as the judge. Sheâs the MAGA sycophant appointed by him. She has already proven she will do anything to help him, so who knows now. Maybe she can slow play the trial until after the election. Maybe her appointment can somehow be appealed by the prosecution since sheâs already proven to be a biased clown. But it does throw a wrench in things.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
RJ, seriously. You need to stop listening to that Russian stooge, Tucker. Didn’t a bunch of operatives have the laptop? You don’t think we would have seen something damning by now besides a bunch of nude picks of Hunter’s cock?
Ah, yes, the FBI — running cover for Democrats. The latest mantra from conservatives, despite the fact that every single person that has ever run the FBI — going back 100+ years — was appointed by Republicans; despite the fact that the guy running it now was literally appointed by Trump himself; despite the fact that law enforcement folks tend to be conservatives. It really takes some serious mental gymnastics to conclude the FBI is biased towards Democrats and covering for them.
When you understand "the deep state" simply refers to the rule of law, it makes much more sense.
